Page 145 - Bulletin 13 2009
P. 145

142





                  using marble “gives his work an exciting almost geological texture”, noted a critic. “Mr
                  Ladan has acquired a mastery of his own methods of working.”


                  Arising from this exhibition one of his pieces, a composition in greens and browns, entitled

                  “Inside Deeper”, was selected as one of the South African entries at the Venice Biennale in

                  1964.  This  was  a  singular  honour  as  the  Biennale  was  the  premier  international  art
                  exhibition, and there was a certain amount of jealous comment from some members of the

                  art establishment. But the art critic observed: “……. Edouard Ladan has been hovering on
                  the fringes of recognition for some time.” He attended the Biennale, enjoying the company

                  of  an  array  of  international  art  personalities,  and  then  travelled  more  widely  in  Europe
                  studying  contemporary  trends  in  European  art.  This  convinced  him  that  “the  brush  and

                  palette”  approach  to  art  was  obsolete.  Art  had  to  keep  pace  with  technological  change

                  embracing new materials and methods. He discovered the metal work of a master, Kemeny,
                  and  the  nail  reliefs  of  Gunther  Vecker  and  returned  home  determined  to  explore  these

                  media – which were familiar to him from his engineering experience. He set to work in the

                  garage at Schoonzicht.


                  His first solo Cape Town exhibition took place in September 1965 at the Wolpe Gallery,
                  but it was too early for his nail work. He exhibited ‘found objects’, monotypes, and mixed

                  media. Critics gave the work mixed reviews in moderated language, but Professor Neville
                  Dubow of the Michaelis School of Fine Art was scathing and his remarks would not have

                  endeared him to Eddie. While his monotypes were once again praised his assemblages of

                  ‘found  objects’,  such  as  ‘Birth  of  Venus’  (Fig.  3.30)  were  felt  to  be  “crude”  and
                  “insufficiently  integrated  into  the  fabric  of  the  composition”.  His  mixed  media

                  compositions,  such  as  ‘Genesis’,  (Fig.  3.31)  were  “prey  to  the  lure  of  the  over-obvious
                  symbol”. To quote from Dubow’s review in the Argus of 14 September:
   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150