Page 89 - Bulletin 17
P. 89

86


               place, but  even then the heavy mist  precluded any very minute inspection with  a view to
               considering sites of stations, and so on. The Joint Committee, however, will, we do not doubt,
               take early steps to put themselves in a position to report to the Council.



               The inspection took place some days later on 10 October and the Joint Committee concluded
               they had no objections to the railway or hotel provided the catchment was fenced in, the hotel

               was built beyond its limits, and hotel drainage did not pollute the water. Their report was
               presented to the Mayor Sir Frederick Smith, an ardent supporter of the project, in February

               1911.


               The First Aerial Cableway Proposal, 1911


               At this time a different proposal came forward. It was from Messrs. W. Spilhaus & Co., of

               Cape Town representing Adolf Bleichert & Co., of Leipzig, Germany, and it was to construct

               and operate an aerial cableway. Bleichert was a railway engineering company and their South
               African  agent,  Mr  Falcke  of  Johannesburg,  had  done  a  preliminary  survey.  The  costs  of

               materials and construction had been calculated at £60,000, annual operating costs at £6,834,
               annual passenger volumes at 50,000, and annual income at £15,000. They had also compared

               the merits of the aerial cableway against the funicular and rack-railways and concluded that

               the  cableway  was  cheaper,  quicker,  environmentally  less  destructive  (no  excavations,
               footings, culverts, and pylons), noiseless, and more feasible than the others. It would start at

               Rocklands  (Vredehoek),  to  which  point  existing  tramlines  would  be  extended  from
               Buitenkant Street, and then go straight to the top. At the top would be a hotel that was vital to

               the scheme’s financial viability.


               This proposal was supported by City Engineer Jeffries but the Council found it unsuitable,

               perhaps  because  they  favoured  the  Swiss  rack-railway  model  on  account  of  its  perceived
               safety and reliability.


               The Platteklip Gorge Funicular Scheme, 1912-14



               In pursuit of this scheme the Council instructed their London representative, Mr Soper, to
               proceed to Switzerland to find a surveyor there. He interviewed a number of engineers with

               experience  in  designing  and  constructing  mountain  railways  and  recommended  Mr  H.  H.
   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94