Page 23 - Bulletin 19 2015
P. 23

20


               1.29.)  He  also  made  detailed  sketches  and  paintings  of  rocks,  plants,  birds,  landscapes,

               architectural structures and ornamentation. His major work, The Stones of Venice (1851-3)
               has been described by Roger Scruton, the English Philosopher as “The greatest description in

               English of a place made sacred by buildings”.


               Ruskin very powerfully stated, “When we build, let us think that we build for ever”.


               His views on Preservation are still debated today and I would like to expand a little here

               because  I  believe  the  theory  relating  to  this  is  important  for  understanding  the  way  we
               conserve  and  preserve.  The  debate  around  how  best  to  safeguard  and  take  care  of  our

               historical buildings can be reduced to a number of possibilities or combinations thereof. (This

               topic is the subject of a thesis but I will give an outline summary for this talk).


               In 1877, William Morris and Philip Webb founded the Society for the Protection of Ancient
               Buildings. Both men were strongly influenced by John Ruskin who said that Preservation, or

               what  we  now  refer  to  as  Conservation,  is  far  preferable  to  Restoration  which  was  being
               practised  in  France  by  one  Violett-le-Duc,  an  architect  and  theorist  famous  for,  amongst

               others, his restoration of Notre Dame in Paris and many other projects.


               Ruskin argued that it was important above all to preserve the status quo and not to add or

               subtract elements of a building. This was, he said, because the most important aspect of a
               building was its age. Any change and that would be lost. Le Duc's Restoration on the other

               hand, combined historical facts together with creative modification. For example, in Notre

               Dame, the building was cleaned and restored but also gained its distinctive third tower as
               well as other smaller changes.


               Today we find ourselves with a rather more complex situation in regard to historical buildings

               by the addition of terms such as rehabilitation, creative or adaptive re-use, restoration to a

               specific period (ie. possible removal of layering from a previous time), total reconstruction
               using either new or original materials, etc.


               All of this is complicated further by the Venice Charter which was created in 1964 for the

               Conservation  and  Restoration  of  Monuments  and  Sites.  Under  the  heading  Restoration,  it
               states in Article 9 that “any extra work which is indispensable must be distinct from the
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28