Page 40 - Bulletin 20 2016
P. 40

37

            standing  on  Buffelsfontein  in  the  eyes  of  the  new  British  authorities,  which  the  Hurter
                                                               th
            ‘vergunning’, as regards Olifantsbos, did not. In a letter dated May 20 , 1808, Mrs Hurter
            wrote to the Acting Colonial Secretary, C. W. Bird, attempting to set the matter straight and
            explained:

                “That the old Dutch Government in former times to each of the principal inhabitants of
                Simon’s Town gave a piece of ground on the other side of the hills of the said town for
                the purpose of erecting kraals for their cattle which for the want of pasture on this side
                they were obliged to send thither; and also for the purpose of constructing huts for the
                people they employed to look after the same.
                That in consequence thereof the former possessor of the house now occupied by your
                Petitioner and others obtained such a spot of land under the denomination of Olifants
                Bosch, of which your Petitioner’s late husband by purchasing the house to which it was
                attached became the proprietor”.
            Mrs. Hurter goes on to explain that her late husband had been “at great trouble and expense”
            to develop this property and that all would be lost if she could not draw from it, “that profit
            from which it is fit to bring in”  (48) .



            From this letter it is obvious that Jan Willem Hurter became party to this land as a special
            ‘vergunning’ when he purchased this property from his father-in-law, Gerhardus Munnik, in
            1785. Whatever the legal standing this arrangement may have enjoyed under Dutch rule it did
            not  pass  muster  with  the  now-British  authorities  who  refused  to  recognize  Mrs.  Hurter  as
            having any rights to Olifantsbos through inheritance, although she still could claim ownership
            of  the  buildings  on  the  farm.  Also  there  was  the  before-mentioned  moratorium  in  place
            against the granting of loan places or in fact, any land for the present that could be construed
            to having been given in perpetuity. To breach this impasse it was decided for the present to
            allow  Mrs.  Hurter  120  morgen  of  land  under  the  conditions  of  a  temporary  fifteen  year
            erfpacht / quitrent. Obviously this was the best the authorities could do for Mrs. Hurter and
            others  like  her  -  until  the  whole  issue  of  how  land  could  be  granted  in  perpetuity  -  was
            resolved by the now-British administration.



            In  a  report  dated  the  10th  of  August  1808  -  the  Deputy  Fiscal  of  Simon’s  Town,  P.  S.
            Buissine  in  on  record  informing  the  Acting  Colonial  Secretary,  C.  W.  Bird,  that  he  had


                                            37
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45