Page 48 - Bulletin 22 2019
P. 48

45


               The  result  was  a  clutter  of  ‘sheds’,  ‘huts’  and  ‘pondoks’  forming  a  ragged  line  of  varied

               shapes, sizes, materials and colours along and below the high tide line. They were described
               in derogatory terms as ‘eyesores’, ‘unsightly’, ‘offensive’, ‘disgraceful’, and ‘disfiguring’ of

               the beach. (Figs. 2.13 - 2.15.)


               In addition to this, vandalism, littering and mixed bathing were taking place to the outrage of
               many people, one of whom was Dr JHM Beck:



                  The Wynberg Times, 23 April 1898:


                  “Dr JHM Beck wrote complaining that the doors of his and other bathing-boxes had been

                  broken, and windows smashed and bathing gear and towels stolen. He also drew attention
                  to the quantity of broken bottles strewn about the beach, and protested against the
                  promiscuous manner in which gentlemen and ladies bathe without proper attire, the slight
                  rags which pass for proper attire would not, he remarked, be tolerated in any part of the
                  civilized world. He suggested that one part of the beach should be reserved for the men

                  and one part for the women and children, but in any part reserved for mixed (men and
                 women) bathing a more seemly costume should be insisted upon. The Council would see
                  that it was simply a matter for regulations and notices. – Resolved that the Secretary be

                  instructed to procure copies of the regulations in force at older watering places.”


               In  1899,  in  an  attempt  to  bring  order  to  the  situation,  the  KB-MM  issued  Bathing  House

               Regulations. The annual permit to erect a bathing box was set at one Guinea, or 21s. A single
               box was to measure 6 ft wide by 8 ft, be spaced 3 ft from its neighbours, with the door facing

               the  sea.  Bathers  were  required  to  wear  proper  bathing  clothes.  This  vague  statement  was
               clarified in Government Notice No. 575 of 3 June 1904 which stipulated that “…nor shall

               any  person  bathe  or  appear  on  the  beach  in  a  bathing  costume  within  the  limits  of  the
               municipality  unless  wearing  a  suitable  bathing  costume  which  shall  consist  of  an  opaque

               garment or garments completely covering the surface of the body from the neck to the knee.

               Penalty £5.” (Fig. 2.16.)


               The  effectiveness  of  the  regulations  is  clear  from  an  approving  statement  in  the  Official

               Guidebook of 1907 - 08:

                  In summer the sight on Muizenberg beach is an exceedingly gay and animated one. No
                  false modesty prevents ladies and gentlemen, suitably attired, from bathing side by side
                 in the pleasant waters; but, as a matter of fact, Muizenberg is one of the few places in the
                  country where decent bathing costumes are insisted upon, and where mixed bathing is

                  carried out in so pleasant and inoffensive a manner. To a great extent this is due to their
                 being convenient bathing boxes on the beach, practically each house in Muizenberg
                 having one.
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53