Page 161 - Bulletin 21
P. 161

158


               1925 Wolfsohn had plans passed for the conversion of what had been a stable. Council was

               far more aware of health issues and an inspection shortly afterwards found that the stable had
               been converted illegally into accommodation occupied by 8 people. (Fig. 4.46.)


               Further  plans  were  passed  in  1925  to  convert  the  building  properly  and  put  in  proper

               drainage. It was declared a slum in 1936 when 18 people lived there and was demolished as
               part of the Flats project. (Fig. 4.47.)





               With Boyes Drive nearing completion in 1930, Wolfsohn wrote to Council with a bold plan

               to demolish all 14 of what he called the ‘temporary’ (they had been there nearly 30 years)
               fishermen’s  cottages  on  which  he  collected  rent.  In  their  place  he  submitted  plans  for  10

               proper brick houses to be occupied by whites. There is no mention of what would happen to
               the  dozens  of  people  who  would  have  nowhere  to  go.  Fortunately,  Councillor  Dr.  A

               Abdurahman was there to make a strong plea and Council dropped the plan.


               Wolfsohn  appeared  before  the  Slums  Clearance  Committee  in  1936  and  surprise  was
               expressed  when  only  two  of  his  properties  were  declared  slums.  Uniquely,  among  all  the

               property owners, his representative said ‘We do not attach the same stigma to the premises
               being declared a slum as other people do’.





               Someone  who  took  a  very  different  view  to  Wolfsohn  at  the  Slum  Clearance  Committee

               hearing in 1936 was Gerhard van Blerk who had instructed a powerful legal team of Dr. T E
               ‘Eben’ Donges (later elected State President) and J du Toit of the law firm Jan S de Villiers.


               Their client was ‘surprised’ that some of his properties had been declared slums as he had

               ‘never had any complaints’. These statements were a clearly a ploy as 11 of his ‘cottages’
               had been condemned as unfit for human habitation by Council in 1915 – 21 years before. The

               1915 MOH report did say there was confidence that van Blerk would ‘continue on with the
               work required slowly, but nevertheless, surely’. (Fig. 4.48.)
   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166