Page 113 - Bulletin 8 2004
P. 113

110




                  The Wynberg Times: 20 July, 1907.

                                                THE HARBOUR SCHEME

                         A deputation from the Ratepayers’ Association waited upon the Council in
                  connection with the proposed fishing harbour at Kalk Bay.
                         Mr. Badman introduced the deputation. He said that with regard to this question, it
                  appeared that a petition signed by various fishermen had been presented to the House of
                  Assembly against the harbour. It had been almost an unknown petition, and many people
                  had been surprised at its presentation. They had reason to believe that several of the
                  signatures were obtained in ignorance. They had been told that several of those men had
                  signed not knowing what they were signing. The Ratepayers’ Association had therefore
                  decided to approach the Council and see what could be done in connection with the matter.
                  It was not a question only concerning Muizenberg and Kalk Bay – it was a matter for the
                  whole of South Africa. In a country where meat was not cheap they should make an
                  endeavour to improve the fishing industry. He thought that it was necessary that they
                  should get up a counter-petition and present it to the House. He did not see why such views
                  should be represented by a few fishermen when there was a great many other people to be
                  considered. There were a great many others who had something at stake as well as the
                  fishermen, and if the building of a harbour was going to be stopped by a few of these men it
                  was time that others took some action.
                         Cr. Auret said that about 20 of the men came to his house and asked him to get up a
                  petition against the harbour.
                         The Mayor: What was their reason?
                         Cr. Auret said the men stated that they would be unable to compete with the bigger
                  vessels which would come to the port. He (Cr. Auret) told them he would have nothing to
                  do with them. He said he was in favour of the harbour. He did not know who got up the
                  petition; he had had nothing to do with it himself. He proceeded to refer to the visit of Mr.
                  Hannon, and said that at that time the men were discontented at something or other.

                         The Mayor said it seemed incredible to hear of such a thing being done. They had
                  done all they possibly could for the poor fishermen, and the Council had gone out of its
                  way to help them, and had urged that something should be done to benefit the industry and
                  make the place more wholesome. In one interview with Mr Fuller he was told that the
                  fishermen were simply impossible and that it was not worth doing anything for them. They
                  were a discontented, grumbling race of men from the beginning to the end. When they
                  could not get anyone to quarrel with they quarrelled amongst themselves. It was the duty of
                  the inhabitants of the place to take up this matter and see that they made the place fit to live
                  in, and that the industry was carried on in a way that would be beneficial to the resort and
                  the public. For many years past this important question had been brought before the
                  Government. The situation at Kalk Bay was of the best, the prevailing winds drove the
                  boats home, and the only thing that was wanted was a haven where the cargoes could be
                  handled properly. There was no place worse adapted at present than Kalk Bay, for the class
   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118